الجزارا فارسی
روایت خاورمیانه 
Film festivals, especially Venice, are recognized in the film industry as places to gauge the quality of films. However, this year, a wall of blunt criticisms of films, particularly aimed at the famous director Danny Boyle, has drawn attention. This wall allows members of the public to express their anger and dissatisfaction about the films they have seen.
Criticisms and Bitter Realities
In an industry that depends on the changing tastes of audiences, film festivals act as indicators of undeniable realities. The reasons for filmmakers' presence at events like Venice, Cannes, and Sundance require empirical evidence of unambiguous quality: a prestigious award, a high score on critics' charts, and a long-standing standing ovation that dispels any doubts about a film's quality.
Risks and Challenges of Festivals
Festivals also seek aesthetics and big stars to attract coverage and sponsorship. For this reason, there is a risk of these events becoming large promotional machines, where every weak film is presented as a classic and every soulless performance is introduced as masterful. This contrast in reality is particularly evident at this year's Venice Festival, where audiences are tired of turning a blind eye to the flaws of films and are seeking the truth hidden behind superficial glories.
This year, audiences have been more outspoken in criticizing films, and it seems that Danny Boyle, as one of the great directors of cinema, is at the center of these criticisms. The calls for making films on the subject of drugs are, in fact, an emphasis on the need to return to the roots and bitter realities of life. Is Boyle ready to address this topic again and hear the voices of the audience?
