Trump Administration Faces Two Legal Defeats in Immigration Policy

The Donald Trump administration faced two major defeats on immigration policy on Monday. A federal judge in Boston halted the time limits on student and journalist visas, while several Democratic-led states have also challenged the new residency restrictions in court.

Visa Bans Suspended

Federal Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV issued a temporary order preventing the government from imposing strict time limits on student visas (F type) and cultural exchange visas (J type). Under Trump's proposed plan, F and J visas would have been limited to four years, while journalist visas (I type) would have been reduced to 240 days. These changes could have affected approximately 1.6 million international students and 500,000 exchange visitors.

Read more: Steve Bannon: Turkey is the biggest threat to America

Legal Challenges Against New Regulations

Meanwhile, two lawsuits were filed in federal court in Manhattan aimed at stopping the new regulations from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). These regulations allow immigration officials to deny green card applications based on new criteria. These criteria particularly relate to the legal use of public assistance, which previously referred to individuals reliant on government support for their livelihood.

During the Biden administration, immigration officials were able to consider cash assistance in evaluating green card applications but were prohibited from penalizing the use of non-cash assistance such as food stamps and Medicaid. Now, the Trump administration is attempting to revive its original policies that consider the use of non-cash assistance as a disqualifying factor.

A DHS spokesperson defended these regulations, claiming that the protesters acted out of fear of losing federal funding. Additionally, New York City Mayor Zohar Maimon stated that this rule seeks to distance immigrant families from programs designed to provide food and health support for them over the years.

According to the protesters, these actions by the Trump administration represent an overreach of its legal authority and a circumvention of Congress, which holds the sole power to set permanent residency criteria. They believe that by penalizing applicants who legally use non-cash assistance, the Trump administration has created illegal restrictions that conflict with federal laws.

Read more: Trump: War with Iran will end after the midterm elections · Trump administration downplays artificial intelligence threats